I was watching IFL Battleground with my longtime friend and roommate last night. Now, for purposes of context and clarification, let me give you a bit of background. He's not necessarily a fan of MMA, but he'll watch UFC fights and enjoy them from time to time. Like any reasonable human being, he thought Karo vs. Diego was amazing. And in general, he's definitely a sports fan. He loves football and basketball, is excited to see Mayweather vs. De La Hoya, actively lifts weights, TiVo's SportsCenter, and so on. He's also my age. In other words, he is part of the 18-34 demographic and tends towards sport-activities and sport-related programming.
But halfway through last night's show he became quickly bored. Yes, the NBA playoffs were on, but that wasn't the only reason. Rather than just rehash what he said, read it for yourself. Remember, this is a guy doesn't look down on MMA at all. He's not an avid watcher, but for lack of a better description, he "gets" the sport.
The following deals with the IFL, their fighters, and the Battleground show.
Him: Dude, are you enjoying this?
Me: Yes, why are you asking?
Him: Are these guys good?
Me: Yes, they're professionals. The IFL is a professional league.
Him: Well, I don't care. Can we not watch it?
Me: Dude, these guys are good. Why don't you want to watch it?
Him: Look, I like the UFC. It's fun, whatever. But I'm not trying to learn a whole new UFC. I've got room for one fighting...thing, you know? There's one NFL, one NBA. I'm not going to learn a bunch of new fighters, and their "teams". And why are they fighting on teams anyway?
Me: It's part of their way of differentiating themselves.
Him: But it's an individual sport.
Me: Well, you compete individually, but you definitely train with a team.
Him: Yeah, but those teams don't matter. I mean, there's no significance or deep relationship to their cities or the other members. These teams don't even have home venues. Big time sports teams have their own venues.
Me: Yeah, that's part of the problem.
Him: Seriously, change it. I'm sure these guys are good, but I'm already spent trying to learn the UFC.
I know that was long and boring, but its important. I don't know how typical his attitude is or how reflective of larger sentiment it is, but I can tell you the IFL better hope he's an anomaly. What he's suggesting is that the brand awareness about the UFC is a) incredibly strong and b) that new comers are UFC-saturated, and c) the UFC has established itself as the brand leader.
Points A and C don't need belaboring, but B does. What my friend is suggesting is that as a casual observer of the sport, there's isn't a MMA world. Hardcore fans of MMA look at all of the sports' players and follow where they wind up. But casual fans do not. They are looking for that
one outlet, that
one leader, that
one source of authority. To them, that is how the sport should be organized (or at least where most of the attention should go). The IFL is going to have to compete with the UFC, but more importantly, they're going to have to undo the idea the UFC is all that matters. The universe of MMA is not the UFC, but unless the IFL can convince people otherwise it might as well be.
Zuffa has also done a good saturating the market. Fans are already overloaded with the ubiquity of UFC-related programming and coverage. As a consequence, casual observers have it in their head that if they want more of MMA, they know to go to the UFC. It's their frame of reference and a focal point for the sport.
The team concept has its advantages, but to the casual fan, it signals the IFL is covering for a deficiency. To the occasional passer-by it says: the team concept is a cover for not having the best fighters. Why else would they do it? After all, its not a team sport. In order for the IFL to succeed and team concept to connect with audiences, putting on good fights - even with legends like Miletich, Renzo, Shamrock(s) - is not enough. You have to make people believe in separate, but equal. I have serious doubts as to whether that's even possible.